1972, 1920x1040
Scoop's notes:
If
you have any
sense and are
not a total
movie nerd,
you probably
guessed
Scorsese. You
would normally
be correct, at
least in a
quiz about the
grand scheme
of things, but
you're not
right in the
context of
this movie.
Here is it
"none of the
above."
Although
Boxcar Bertha
is a Corman
quickie made
for the
drive-in
market, shot
in three weeks
with multiple
Carradines, it
was in fact
directed by
the legendary
Martin
Scorsese.
This
wasn't a
project
originated by
Scorsese. He
was just a
hired gun on
this film,
which came a
year before
his big
breakthrough
with Mean
Streets.
Although he
would
eventually
prove to be a
contemplative
filmmaker,
Scorsese had
no problem
delivering a
proper
exploitation
film. The
characters are
fairly
interesting,
there's plenty
of action, a
touch of
comedy ... and
there is
plentiful sex.
In fact, the
sex scenes in
this film were
particularly
memorable, for
a couple of
reasons:
- There
is
considerable
exposure from
a woman who
would later
become a
distinguished
mainstream
star, namely
Barbara
Hershey. Not
many serious
actresses have
a role in
their career
with this much
nudity from
every
conceivable
angle. The
film isn't a
softcore
because the
sex scenes
occupy a small
portion of the
running time,
but the nudity
is as explicit
as any
softcore sex
film. Looking
back from the
future, there
is the added
bonus of a
famous woman
wearing all
that skin.
- Barbara
Hershey and
David
Carradine
weren't fakin'
it. They have
both admitted
that they were
doin' the
nasty for
real.
Unlike
many Corman
movies, this
film makes at
least a
half-hearted
attempt at
social
relevance.
Based on the
real-life
autobiographical
journals of
Boxcar Bertha
Thompson, the
film tells a
little bit of
the story
behind the
workers'
struggle to
unionize
against the
railroads in
the 30's. That
serious
subtext,
combined with
Scorsese's
quality work,
really raised
this film a
cut above the
B-level market
that it was
supposed to
play to. When
the man had a
set piece to
film, by God
the young
Scorsese
already knew
what to do
with it. There
are some
camera set-ups
in this film
that are
exceptionally
dramatic,
especially the
final scene,
shot down at
Bertha from
the top of a
moving boxcar,
watching her
run as she
tries to keep
up with the
speeding
train, the
entire shot
framed over
the shoulders
of a crucified
David
Carradine.
Pretty heavy
drive-in fare.
Of
course, the
film was not
created to
make a
statement or
to exercise
anyone's
social
conscience.
Roger Corman
was in the
movie business
to make a
profit, and
his formula
was: keep
costs low,
fire plenty of
bullets, flash
plenty of
flesh, capture
the zeitgeist,
and save money
with an
economical
recycling of
ideas and
scripts from
earlier
movies. The
"social
relevance" of
this film was
actually an
economically
viable angle
at the time.
This was a
drive-in movie
and the
drive-in
audience
skewed young.
In the period
1968-1974, a
film had to
have a strong
anti-establishment
stance to
attract the
youthful
audience, so
Corman made
sure to pander
to that. Also,
Bonnie and
Clyde was a
major cultural
phenomenon in
that era and
this was one
of many
"Bonnie and
Clyde" clones
(Bloody Mama,
Big Bad Mama,
Dillinger)
that Corman
made to cash
in on that
vogue. The
criminals in
this film may
have had
loftier ideals
than the
others
mentioned, but
they were
still cut from
the same cloth
as Bonnie and
Clyde - a
glamorous
young couple
who pulled off
charming
robberies, and
who were
popular with
the people,
despite being
despised by
the
authorities.