Restraint
2008
With the police hot on their tails and a dead body in their boot, a
fugitive Aussie couple takes refuge in which they believe to be an abandoned
mansion. It turns out to be inhabited by a rich agoraphobic, whom they
immediately bind and gag for future use as a hostage or shield. That is the
premise for a cat-and-mouse game between the hostage and his captors in which
the victim uses every tool at his disposal to wheedle, cajole, and hoodwink
the people who will determine whether he lives or dies. The rich man convinces
the couple that he can get them a large sum of getaway capital if they stay
around for two days and withdraw money from the bank for him, with the female
impersonating his long-absent fiancée. In the course of that time, he isolates
the woman, who
is sensitive and has committed no crimes herself, and fills her head
with the idea that she is capable of walking away from the charges and
starting a new life - the kind of life she deserves. As the woman's sadistic
boyfriend begins to understand what is happening between the other two, his
temper starts to explode more and more often, and the violence levels
escalate.
Additional dramatic tension is provided when the police stop by the mansion
from time to time, ostensibly to check up on the rich man. The tautest moments
occur when the working class woman has to go to the bank disguised as the rich
fiancée, at which time she may or may not be recognized by a bank officer whom
she bumped into at a gas station the previous day - just before her boyfriend
killed the station attendant.
I love a good erotic thriller, but it is difficult to find one. Most of the
time we genre fans have to settle for either an interesting story or some
titillation, not both, because the combination seems about as easy to find as
the Holy Grail. You can just about count the great erotic thrillers of the
color film era on one hand: Body Double, Body Heat, the remake of The Postman
Always Rings Twice, maybe Basic Instinct ... and?
As a genre fan, I must tip my hat to screenwriter Dave Warner and director
David Denneen, who produced a film which does deliver on both parts of the
elusive combination, a feat made more impressive because Denneen has never
before made a feature-length film, and because the film is essentially a
three-character stage play, which is a form not easily converted to good
cinema.
To cut to the chase, let me offer a laundry list of the things I like about
this film:
1. I'll begin with the erotica. Teresa Palmer is a good actress who has a
beautiful face and the body of a centerfold. She is not shy about exposing
that body in delectable ways. There are some sex scenes with both men, but my
favorite bit of erotica is a brief scene in which the rich man is stuffed into
the bathtub, bound to the faucets, and Teresa walks past him stark naked to
get to the shower. She taunts the reserved man with her toned and curvaceous
shape, and the cinematography shows just enough to let us see how he must be
reacting, while it simultaneously holds back enough to get us involved and
make us want more.
2. The story-telling is subtle and clever. The film leaves several details
unexplained, yet the evidence is there in front of us, if we choose to use our
eyes and then to think about what we have seen. If you watch the film, note
carefully how the film shows that the murderer has disposed of his car and
decided to use the rich man's vintage Mercedes to drive away, and then note
how the film show precisely where and how the murderer's car has been disposed
of. Also note how the film underplays the two meetings between the girlfriend
and the bank officer. The oblique narrative technique is very involving, but
this is not a film that you can watch while you're doing something else. It
demands that you pay attention to all the details, right up to the conclusion.
The ending of the film actually leaves us hanging about the future of two of
the characters, yet the script has planted subtle clues along the way which
tell us that all may not go as those two have planned. The script lays out
enough possibilities that we can mentally write our own endings, and then
debate our theories when the film has ended.
3. The calculating nature of the agoraphobic is gradually revealed, and
even darker secrets are only hinted at. The stuttering rich man seems at first
to be a helpless victim, but as he slowly turns the tide in his favor, we find
that we are not rooting for him as enthusiastically as we might. There is
something about him which is so manipulative and cold that we are led to
wonder which of the two men before us is really the bad guy. By the end of the
film, I was convinced that the victim had probably murdered his own missing
fiancée, although that idea is never stated explicitly anywhere in the film.
4. The cinematography is excellent. The film has been meticulously
storyboarded to tell the story visually, and the director of photography
captured the right mood by using a palette somewhere between color and B&W,
which allows him to create moody exterior shots while capturing the gothic
menace of the mansion.
5. The editing and pacing are also excellent. Virtually every situation in
the film is laden with tension of some kind, and the viewer involvement is
accentuated by the score. (To be honest, I thought the score was intrusive in
some spots, but if you think of the great erotic thrillers, you'll realize
that is quite typical of the genre, in which the score is often used as
another guilty pleasure.)
I started to watch this film with no idea what it was, and was immediately
entranced by a very nifty genre film. I would be happy enough to watch a sexy
thriller with a story that holds my attention, but when it is also made with
intelligence and elan on a bare-bones budget, I have to commend the
outstanding work from the writer, director, editor, cinematographer, and
actors - as well as Teresa Palmer's parents for donating those genes.
Impressive.
Here, of course, is Teresa
Palmer - it's like seeing Naomi Watts with a stripper's body!
